Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Darren Palmer's avatar

I commend you for using the term African, and not "black." As long as we get continue to use this binary (Anglican) racial oversimplification, we are consigning ourselves to mental slavery and discrimination. In fact the terms, Kushitic or Nilotic is even better than African or Eithiopian becuase they do not reflect Eurasion influences.

Expand full comment
Robert A Mosher (he/him)'s avatar

My own ancestral roots run from North America to the British Isles (all parts) with a couple of stray Germans thrown in, so I try to follow closely the DNA research on the population of those islands and how my ancestors fit into those patterns. I was fascinated by the reported results some years ago (since 2000) of a nationwide study that offered regional DNA identifications. This research indicated that there was a small but identifiable African presence in the Isles possibly going back to the trade links between the Isles and the Mediterranean reported by the Greeks. The hypothesis seems to be that the vessels involved in this trade included Africans as crew, merchants, or just travelers and they interacted with the local populations. Certainly, I've noted across history that the work of merchant sailors was hard enough that ships' masters would sign on as crew anybody who looked like they could do the work - they didn't have much time for concerns about race. And the ports of Africa would have welcomed the metals available in the Isles and found a ready market for the goods they could provide in turn.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts